why use BOP?
+ PROBLEMS FACED BY MEDIA OWNERS (PUBLISHERS)
- Print is not as easily transactable as other media classes
- Declining revenues due to difficulty in execution of large campaigns
- High cost of sales people, management and training
- Archaic back end systems that do not integrate
- Selling bundles and packages is cumbersome
- CPM agilities with easy comparison of geographies and audiences
- Multiple reporting formats/points
- Speed to market is in general suboptimal
- Remnant inventory management
- Premium inventory management
HOW BOP CAN HELP MEDIA OWNERS
- BOP can readily compose bundles of publications and make them visible to buyers
- BOP can use the platform's intelligence to target likely buyers
- Reach (readership) and value (Price, CPM) are readily calculable and visible to buyers
- Responding to agency booking requests and requests for quotes is simple, and reuses packages defined by the agency instead of requiring duplicate data entry
- Support for the full RFP (Request for Proposal) lifecycle
- Options of tentative proposal and formal offer, with chat-based negotiation to finalise deals
- All communication is captured on the platform, and an email audit trail exists
- Two-way handshake required for amendments and cancellations after sale, results in fewer disputes and account queries
- A small operations team can manage the mechanics of booking, leaving salespeople free to concentrate on actual sales - add value
- Yield management strategies are easy to define and implement
- Implementing well-defined APIs to query availability and take bookings will enable back-end systems to integrate with the transacting platform
- Accelerates sales cycle and reduces cost of sales
+ PROBLEMS FACED BY MEDIA BUYERS (AGENCIES)
- Hard to transact Print electronically like digital
- Difficult to compare the reach (readership) and value (CPM) of packages from different publishers, and compare against other media classes
- Takes time and effort to execute large plans quickly
- Cumbersome to extract an individual suppliers' data out of a comprehensive schedule in order to request inventory from them
- Negotiation with suppliers is time-consuming and typically conducted over multiple media, hard to keep track of negotiating points and agreements reached
- Many disputes and account queries because of inconsistent audit trail of negotiation and data entry
- Lack of integration with billing systems necessitates duplicate data entry
- Difficult to keep track of different contracted rates which vary with publisher and client
- Difficult to reuse older schedule templates when running similar campaigns
HOW BOP CAN HELP AGENCIES
- Powerful search functions allow quick identification of publications targeting defined audience groups
- Extremely easy to put together publications for a campaign (hours in place of days)
- Ability to buy publications from original publishers or from their representatives
- Ability to view break-up of schedule insertions and budgets by market region or by supplier with a single click
- All publication data (i.e., media kit) is pre-loaded and maintained up to date by the platform
- Very little manual data entry - most activity consists of selecting items from dropdowns, which is fast and error-free
- Schedules are automatically split by publisher and sent to them
- Ability to negotiate terms with individual publishers
- Full audit trail of all negotiations, chat transcripts are included in the email trail
- Two-way handshake required for amendments and cancellations after sale, results in fewer disputes and account queries
- Team functions available to work on large schedules - save, resume, copy, lock against modification, etc.
- Ability to reuse past schedules as templates for subsequent campaigns, which is faster than creating schedules from scratch
- Integration with billing systems is simple - based on batch file export or real-time API as required
- Full confidentiality of information between various client teams